Indications are, over on Michelle Malkin’s blog, that I’m not the only person wondering why the traitors at the NYT and LAT aren’t under arrest, along with every traitor in the CIA and State Department (and wherever else) who sourced the leaks.
As one correspondent writes, “If this isn’t treason, what is?”
And wait till you see the names of people on the Left who urged the Times to spike the story. Hint: One of them rhymes with Bertha.
Let’s see if the enemy camp at the Times deigns publish this letter to the editor from John Snow.
You have defended your decision to compromise this program by asserting that “terror financiers know” our methods for tracking their funds and have already moved to other methods to send money. The fact that your editors believe themselves to be qualified to assess how terrorists are moving money betrays a breathtaking arrogance and a deep misunderstanding of this program and how it works. While terrorists are relying more heavily than before on cumbersome methods to move money, such as cash couriers, we have continued to see them using the formal financial system, which has made this particular program incredibly valuable.
Michelle Malkin has some great blabbermouth posters up on her site. And my favorite is in this batch.
Andy McCarthy blows the fog away from the NYT’s position and makes it clear why they choose treason.
The Times prattles on about what it claims is a dearth of checks and balances, but what are the checks and balances on Bill Keller? Can it be that our security hinges on whether the editor of an antiwar, for-profit journal thinks some defense measure might be interesting?
I know that this blog is only read by a handful. So far, at least. And yet I hope that nobody reading Buttle’s World is giving a penny of subscription money to the New York Times or the Los Angelese Times.
We have to draw the line somewhere.
And tell a friend.
UPDATE:
The Editors at NRO have a good idea of what else to do to the Times: Yank their White House press pass.
