Andy McCarthy blows the fog away from the NYT’s position and makes it clear why they choose treason.
The Times prattles on about what it claims is a dearth of checks and balances, but what are the checks and balances on Bill Keller? Can it be that our security hinges on whether the editor of an antiwar, for-profit journal thinks some defense measure might be interesting?
I know that this blog is only read by a handful. So far, at least. And yet I hope that nobody reading Buttle’s World is giving a penny of subscription money to the New York Times or the Los Angelese Times.
We have to draw the line somewhere.
And tell a friend.
UPDATE:
The Editors at NRO have a good idea of what else to do to the Times: Yank their White House press pass.
Leave a Reply