Niel Armstrong is my kind of hero. When the best available evidence was that he muffed his line on the moon, dropping the “a”, he accepted that he may have screwed up. But now it seems that (as I suspected all along) the “a” was just obscured by static. Says Armstrong:
“I have reviewed the data and Peter Ford’s analysis of it, and I find the technology interesting and useful,” he said.
“I also find his conclusion persuasive. Persuasive is the appropriate word.”
No word yet on whether or not he really found Allah on the moon.
Leave a Reply