As I suspected, it’s not what’s in the emails but what’s in the released code that damages the AGW alarmists’ case.
Sexing up a graph is at best a misdemeanor. But a Declan McCullough story suggests a more disturbing possibility: the CRU’s main computer model may be, to put it bluntly, complete rubbish.
I came across this analysis of what is a very reasonable analysis of validating the various computer models for global warming. The gist of it is that the models are simply worthless for predicting future conditions.
mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/13592/
Comment by phil c — 2 December, 2009 @ 20:40